← All reports

A social media ban for under-16s is not proportionate or effective in protecting children's rights.

Legal IssuesSocial IssuesCulturePoliticsMay 30, 2026score 0.172 posts · 0 replies across 1 instances
The thread discusses the argument against implementing a social media ban for under-16s, citing lack of effectiveness, proportionality, and enforceability. It references a report by the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland.

Claims

A social media ban for under-16s is not proportionate or effective in protecting children's rights.
Parent: Social Media RegulationEntity: Under-16s Social Media BanImpact: negativeDate: May 30, 2026Target: A social media ban for under-16s

Source posts

@[email protected]
An Under-16s Social Media Ban Would not be Proportionate or Effective. https://web.brid.gy/r/https://theorkneynews.scot/2026/05/30/an-under-16s-social-media-ban-would-not-be-proportionate-or-effective/
0 boosts · 0 favs · 0 replies · May 30, 2026
#health#localnews#news#childrenscommissioner#childrensrights#socialmedia
@[email protected]
An Under-16s Social Media Ban Would not be Proportionate or Effective. A social media ban for under-16s would not be a proportionate, effective, or enforceable way to currently protect children’s rights, according to the Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland. Commissioner Nicola Killean argues that the available evidence does not show a blanket ban would make children safer online, and may inadvertently push children to less regulated or riskier parts of… https://theorkneynews.scot/2026/05/30/an-under-16s-social-media-ban-would-not-be-proportionate-or-effective/
3 boosts · 0 favs · 0 replies · May 30, 2026