CEOs are more susceptible to AI psychosis because they are not directly involved in the technical execution and practical implementation of AI systems.

“CEOs are uniquely prone to AI psychosis because they’re sufficiently distant from the last mile of work that still has to happen to generate most value with AI,” Box founder Aaron Levie wrote on X. CEOs “play with AI,” develop a prototype, or generate a contract, and then make the leap to believing agents can do the work. But these top-level executives aren’t the people who have to review code, discover bugs, and identify calls to hallucinated libraries before software is deployed. They aren’t responsible for training AI models on a company’s idiosyncratic contract terms, nor do they have to spend days combing through contracts to find sneaky terms, as Levie indicates. In other words, Levie’s theory posits, CEOs don’t really understand processes well enough to know what really can and can’t be automated. But that lack of knowledge doesn’t stop them from acting on their beliefs https://techcrunch.com/2026/05/27/tech-ceos-are-apparently-suffering-from-ai-psychosis/

“CEOs are uniquely prone to AI psychosis because they’re sufficiently distant from the last mile of work that still has to happen to generate most value with AI,” Box founder Aaron Levie wrote on X. Here's @Techcrunch's Julie Bort on the consequences of execs not understanding the technology they're implementing. https://flip.it/kKXz7b #Technology #AI #AIPsychosis