← All reports

Judges' rulings on transparency in police investigations influence voter decisions.

Public SafetyPoliticsOct 31, 2026score 0.172 posts · 0 replies across 1 instances
The user discusses the availability of information on judges and their rulings on transparency in police investigations, highlighting the difficulty of making an informed voting decision.

Claims

Judges' rulings on transparency in police investigations influence voter decisions.
Parent: ElectionsEntity: Judicial TransparencyImpact: positiveDate: Oct 31, 2026Target: Judges' rulings on transparency in police investigations

Source posts

@[email protected]
Too late to help me, but one of my law-savvy friends sent me a link to this site that has more info on each judge https://intelligence.trellis.law/california-judges-2026/supreme-court/ https://intelligence.trellis.law/california-judges-2026/court-of-appeal/first-district/ Now I see that Preston's nemesis ruled for more transparency around investigation of Vallejo's badge-bending cops, which sounds pretty good to me. Ugh, adding more information just makes it harder to choose. Good thing I already turned in my ballot
0 boosts · 0 favs · 0 replies · Oct 31, 2026
@[email protected]
#sfpol Too late to help me, but one of my law-savvy friends sent me a link to this site that has more info on each judge on the ballot https://intelligence.trellis.law/california-judges-2026/supreme-court/ https://intelligence.trellis.law/california-judges-2026/court-of-appeal/first-district/ Now I see that Preston's nemesis ruled for more transparency around investigation of Vallejo's badge-bending cops, which sounds pretty good to me. Ugh, adding more information just makes it harder to choose. Good thing I already turned in my ballot
0 boosts · 0 favs · 0 replies · Oct 31, 2026
#sfpol