← All reports

The binary classification of databases as either CP or AP is an oversimplification that fails to capture the complexity of modern database systems.

Database DesignTechnologySep 1, 2026score 0.172 posts · 0 replies across 1 instances
The thread discusses a 2015 blog post by Martin Kleppmann arguing against the classification of databases as either CP (Consistent and Partition-tolerant) or AP (Available and Partition-tolerant), as per the CAP theorem. The discussion highlights the limitations of this binary classification in modern database design and the need for a more nuanced understanding of database properties.

Claims

The binary classification of databases as either CP or AP is an oversimplification that fails to capture the complexity of modern database systems.
Parent: Database DesignEntity: CAP Theorem ClassificationImpact: negativeDate: Sep 1, 2026Target: Binary classification of databases as CP or AP

Source posts

@[email protected]
Please stop calling databases CP or AP (2015) https://martin.kleppmann.com/2015/05/11/please-stop-calling-databases-cp-or-ap.html Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49521490 #HackerNews #databases #CP #AP #dataarchitecture #datastorage #technology
0 boosts · 0 favs · 0 replies · Sep 1, 2026
#hackernews#databases#cp#ap#dataarchitecture#datastorage
@[email protected]
Please stop calling databases CP or AP (2015) https://martin.kleppmann.com/2015/05/11/please-stop-calling-databases-cp-or-ap.html #database
0 boosts · 0 favs · 0 replies · Sep 1, 2026
#database