← All reports

The government's privacy reform bill is not credible due to its history of undermining privacy through measures like age verification, metadata retention, and weak rules for political parties.

PrivacyPoliticsTechnologyLegal IssuesJun 14, 2026score 0.432 posts · 1 replies across 1 instances
The thread discusses the government's proposed privacy reform bill, highlighting concerns about its credibility due to past actions like age verification, metadata retention, and weak privacy rules for political parties. The posts criticize the government's lack of genuine commitment to privacy despite public promises.

Claims

The government's privacy reform bill is not credible due to its history of undermining privacy through measures like age verification, metadata retention, and weak rules for political parties.
Parent: Government PolicyEntity: Privacy Reform BillImpact: negativeDate: Jun 14, 2026 - Jun 15, 2026Target: The government's privacy reform bill

Source posts

@[email protected]
The government will promise to make privacy a fundamental right in a privacy reform bill coming tomorrow. But it’s not credible on privacy when it actively undermines it through lawful access, age verification for millions, and weak rules for political parties. https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/06/privacy-as-a-fundamental-right-the-governments-terrible-privacy-track-record-suggests-virtue-signalling-over-a-genuine-commitment/
8 boosts · 9 favs · 1 replies · Jun 14, 2026
@[email protected]
The government is tabling privacy reform today. That’s overdue, but its privacy track record is terrible: mandated age verification for millions, mandatory metadata retention, weaker privacy rules for political parties, and sidelining the Privacy Commish. https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2026/06/privacy-as-a-fundamental-right-the-governments-terrible-privacy-track-record-suggests-virtue-signalling-over-a-genuine-commitment/
2 boosts · 4 favs · 0 replies · Jun 15, 2026