← All reports

The Supreme Court has ruled that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cell phone location history, which is protected under the Fourth Amendment.

PrivacyLegal IssuesSocial IssuesTechnologyJun 29, 2026score 0.812 posts · 1 replies across 2 instances
The Supreme Court ruled that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cell phone location history, protecting it under the Fourth Amendment. The ruling addresses geofence warrants and their implications for privacy rights.

Claims

The Supreme Court has ruled that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cell phone location history, which is protected under the Fourth Amendment.
Parent: PrivacyEntity: Cell Phone Location DataImpact: positiveDate: Jun 29, 2026Target: The protection of cell phone location data under the Fourth Amendment

Source posts

@[email protected]
The Supreme Court ruled today against #geofence warrants, saying that Americans have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cell phone location history. This book excerpt explores the case in question and the surveillance technology behind it. https://spectrum.ieee.org/digital-surveillance
4 boosts · 1 favs · 0 replies · Jun 29, 2026
#geofence
@[email protected]
In major #privacy win, #SupremeCourt rules #geofence #warrants are protected by privacy rights In the 6-3 ruling, #SCOTUS said that “an individual has a reasonable expectation of privacy in his cell-phone #location information.” According to the court, that means people have privacy rights when it comes to the location history collected by their phones, as well as the services and apps running on them. #4thAmendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. https://techcrunch.com/2026/06/29/in-major-privacy-win-supreme-court-rules-geofence-warrants-are-protected-by-privacy-rights/
7 boosts · 0 favs · 1 replies · Jun 29, 2026
#privacy#supremecourt#geofence#warrants#scotus#location