← All reports

The defense secretary's decision to exclude female and Black Navy officers from promotion lists is motivated by anti-diversity, racist, and sexist attitudes rather than merit-based considerations.

ConflictDiscriminationPoliticsJun 1, 2026score 2.892 posts · 86 replies across 2 instances
The thread discusses the defense secretary's decision to exclude female and Black Navy officers from promotion lists, attributing the action to anti-diversity, racist, and sexist motives. This issue highlights concerns about discrimination and fairness in military promotions.

Claims

The defense secretary's decision to exclude female and Black Navy officers from promotion lists is motivated by anti-diversity, racist, and sexist attitudes rather than merit-based considerations.
Parent: MilitaryEntity: Navy promotionsImpact: negativeDate: Jun 1, 2026Target: The defense secretary's decision to exclude female and Black Navy officers from promotion lists is motivated by anti-diversity, racist, and sexist attitudes rather than merit-based considerations.

Source posts

@[email protected]
#Hegseth Strikes #Female & #Black #Navy Officers From Promotion List The #defense secretary’s decision to block the officers’ promotions appears entirely driven by his “anti-diversity” [#racism & #sexism] stance rather than based on merit. #Trump #MilitaryReadiness #WhiteSupremacy #MaleSupremacy https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/us/politics/hegseth-navy-promotion-list.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share
67 boosts · 31 favs · 7 replies · Jun 1, 2026
#hegseth#female#black#navy#defense#racism
@[email protected]
Racist, misogynist swine… “Hegseth Strikes Female and Black Navy Officers From Promotion List The defense secretary’s decision to block the officers’ promotions appears driven by his anti-diversity stance rather than based on merit.” https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/01/us/politics/hegseth-navy-promotion-list.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share
11 boosts · 0 favs · 2 replies · Jun 1, 2026